sistem audio

[skyseven]

In zece ani am schimbat aprox. 5 DAC-uri, 6 casti, 4 amp-uri dedicate de casti, 3 transporturi si peste zece cabluri audiofile. Am audiat (detinut) in aceasta perioada mai multe surse High-end si doua sisteme electrostatice (cu aplificare electrostatica in regim DIY). A fost o experienta cool pe care nu o regret. Daca aveti posibilitatea sa ascultati un Lavry, un Audio Research DAC7 sau un STAX pe partea de casti veti intelege despre ce vorbesc. Desigur ca si dinamicele gen AKGK701, Senn HD650 sau Beyer DT880 livreaza un sunet bun, dar electrostaticele le devanseaza categoric pe partea de detaliu, transparenta sonora si textura. 

[harrypoker77]

Muzica ascultata la casti e ca oralul cu prezervativ.

[skyseven]

Muzica ascultata la casti e ca oralul cu prezervativ.

 

Nu si la o casca de calitate pe un sistem high-end, Daca vrei sa obtii acelasi nivel de textura sonora trebuie sa investesti mult mai mult in incinte (unde conteaza enorm pozitionarea, tratamentul acustic al incaperii, sinergia cu amplificarea, cabluri, etc).

[skyseven]

Incercati DAC-ul (ce include si amplificare pentru casca) iFi micro iDSD. Pentru cei 500 de euro suna superb!

 

http://headphone.guru/ifi-idsd-micro/

 

https://parttimeaudiophile.com/2015/05/09/review-ifi-audio-micro-iphono-and-idsd/

 

[alexqwerty1234]

Eu am băgat căștile care au venit cu telefonul Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, și anume: MH750 la PC.

10/10 best bass

[skyseven]

Eu am băgat căștile care au venit cu telefonul Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, și anume: MH750 la PC.

10/10 best bass

ufff,... Vorbeam mai sus despre o solutie high-fidelity (hai sa nu pomenesc nimic de High-end)

[humanoid_carbon_unit]

marantz-uri cu boxe canton.

casti de la audiotehnica si shure (urechelnite) + player cowon.

[Vizitator]

Eu am set de la Sony.

Home Cinema Sony dav 260

Căști wireless Sony

Telefon Sony

TV Sony Bravia

Alte minicasti Sony

Pare ca am o obsesie,însă nu am auzit bass mai dulce nicăieri.Ăștia de la Sony îl fac...magnific.

[putzifer77]

Le recomand daca aveti o placa de sunet buna.

 

[expertul888]

Picap

[neiberr]

Vad ca sunt pe aici multi audiofili (manele, rock , etc)

 

Sunt curios ce sisteme audio aveti tinand cont ca fac o diferenta majora in felul cum privim muzica

 

Eu prefer castile pt a asculta muzica(acasa sau la serviciu):

 

Sennheiser HD  650

 

Amplificatior + DAC Fiio E17 Alpen

 

 

 

 

Sursa : Internet Radio Spotify / sau Youtube

 

Pustiule castile nu sunt sistem audio....sunt anexe in loc de boxe....un sistem audio se compune din amplificator sau preanficator+cu amplicator

sursa de muzica care poate fi CD player,casetofon,magnetofon,radio,dat,picup,pc....etc...si boxe.Auditia la casti adevarate este super ok ...dar vezi ca in timp

o sa surzesti daca asculti mai multe ore pe zi.Eu de exemplu am un sistem audio Tehnics made in Japan amplificator pe ace....etc.

 

Suna incredibil ....

[neiberr]

stimate "indubitabil" e intr-adevar indubitabil ca nu poti incondeia oua (sau oo..?!) de paste cu o pensula de 3'' de la bricostore, cum de altfel e indubitabil ca sunt audiofili dar si colectionari (de scule audio mai mult sau mai putin profi)

probabil ca in cluburile de la mare sau din bucuresti sau de aiurea nu v-ar placea sa ascultati muzica  surdina

calitatea sunetului din casti (oricat de performante ar fi ele) care iti dau semnalul de la cativa mm (milimetri), nu poate fi la fel de buna ca cea a unui sunet venit din amplificare si boxe de putere mai mare si desigur de calitate

probabil ca daca ti-as spune ca eu conduc un logan ai rade de mine , tu avand Porsche audi bmw sau Mercedes

eu am :

puteri (amplificatoare pentru spectatori): EP2500, stage line sta600, UHER reference no 1, Marantz, sharp, sony, Toshiba.... cea mai mica putere este 200W(audio)....si boxele pereche pentru fiecare amplif. unele amplificatoare duc 2 perechi de boxe.

pe langa astea: mixere (4 buc) egalizatoare, procesoare de sunet, compresoare, excitere, crossover, preamplificatoare...

si.... desigur mag AKAI si 3 turntable (pickupuri adica)

apoi: DMX (asta e un "mixer" pentru lumini),dimmer-pack-uri, movingheaduri scannere stroboscoape lasere si masina de fum

 

PS: maneaua ucide !

PPS: nu sunt "sunetistul" de la voltaj

 

PPPS: am si pe lampi !!!

 

stima !

sa nu zici ca ai AKAI 747....!virf de lance...dar vezi ca exista si casti super adevarate....recomand aplificator MC Intosch....

[thelitllebig]

eu inca il mai am pe moshulica .... e ascultator , sincer , cu caracter si e intr-o forma de invidiat batranu' .... eu incep sa albesc , sa ma ingras .... el nimic .... tanar si frumos  !

 

http://audio-database.com/AKAI/player/gx-77.JPG

[man@work]

 

sa nu zici ca ai AKAI 747....!virf de lance...dar vezi ca exista si casti super adevarate....recomand aplificator MC Intosch....

 

nu, nu am 747

in schimb asta vara mi-am cumparat un Pioneer RT 909 rackable

care arata f f f bine intr-unul din rack-urile mele de vintage-uri

in legatura cu castile, am cateva perechi, preferatele mele sunt Sony, super bass, nu am amplificator de casti, le cuplez totdeuna la unul din mixere, doar pt a selecta sursa si/sau melodia  

[neiberr]

nu, nu am 747

in schimb asta vara mi-am cumparat un Pioneer RT 909 rackable

care arata f f f bine intr-unul din rack-urile mele de vintage-uri

in legatura cu castile, am cateva perechi, preferatele mele sunt Sony, super bass, nu am amplificator de casti, le cuplez totdeuna la unul din mixere, doar pt a selecta sursa si/sau melodia

Super mai facut curios cu castile Sony ca au un bass ca lumea...Eu am avut o pereche de casti vitange tehnics

cumparate cu 70 de ron....extraordinare nici o pereche de boxe pe care le am nu sunau precum castile respective...

[tk2xxx]

M au dat banii afara din casa( sau nu ma mai duce instalatia si dau bani pe chestii scumpe ) ca sa compensez ) si mi am schimbat sistemul

- casti Sennheiser HD 700

 

Designed to fill the gap between the HD 650s and the flagship HD 800s, the new HD 700s essentially share the status of flagship top-of-the-line headphones with the 800s. The open 800s are superb dynamic headphones featuring spatial accuracy and unparalleled imaging. Their innovative design uses a large "ring radiator" driver that is positioned a bit forward of the ears and then angled slightly backwards so that they deliver a more planar wave front. That modified acoustic wave front is the source of the 800s improved imaging as it more closely mimics the way we actually perceive sound. Listening to orchestral music, for example, produces an often uncanny sound stage of depth and breadth that enables you to position each instrument with impressive accuracy as to spatial location. The timbre of each instrument is likewise accurately reproduced, making the 800s the headphone of choice for recording purposes if accuracy is the major criterion. But all of this spatial and acoustic accuracy comes with a price. Some listeners find the 800s to be overly accurate, too acoustically detailed, too "analytical" in its approach. There is a slight increase in frequency response at 7khz during the otherwise nearly perfect treble roll-off, which may be the source of that perceived aggressive accuracy which some have found fatiguing. My listening experience has not found them problematic but nearly perfect in their ability to reproduce any given recording. The 800s are well engineered for reproducing instrumental and vocal music recorded with "passive" techniques, that is without the added distortion, compression, coloring, bass or brightness of many current popular music recordings. Headphones like the Audeze LCD-2 with their potent bass and fast response may be more attuned to this variety of popular music.

The reaction of some to the 800s may be why the new HD 700s were created. They have a slightly warmer, more gemutlich (congenial) sonic approach. Their spatial imaging is nearly as well focused as the 800s but with an acoustic signature that sounds less analytical, more "analog" in comparison to the 800's slightly more "digital" quality. What some perceive as the 800's incrementally brighter treble seems to have been modified a bit, creating a more rounded and even plumper (in a good way) upper range. To my ears the HD 700s sound less aggressively realistic and more "relaxed" in reproducing treble. Their musical accuracy remains excellent. Listening to Mozart, for example, their sonic quality matches the elegance of the music note for note. Mozart's transparent orchestration for the Piano Concerto No.17 is reproduced by the 700s with comparable transparency. The qualities that struck me while listening were their transparency, elegance and musical warmth. To my ears, they possess the best attributes of a cross between the older HD 600s, with their natural and relaxed presentation, and the HD 800s, with their superlative imaging and generous sound stage. My guess is that the slight rise in frequency response at 7 khz, found in the 800s, was significantly reduced while engineering the HD 700s.

The bottom line is that the HD 700s boast nearly the same spatial accuracy and imaging capability as the flagship HD 800s. With good source material the 700s create a palpable sense of true-to-life acoustic presence. Bass reproduction is crisp and punchy. Mid-range is vibrant and clear. Treble is crystalline and sharp without a hint of auditory fatigue after hours of very comfortable listening. These headphones are superbly musical. In my experience, only the much more expensive Audeze LCD-3's approach them (amongst non-electrostatic headphones) in reproducing the richness and life of the musical spectrum. As with all of Sennheiser's top of the line dynamic headphones, you'll need a headphone amplifier in order to realize their full potential. Without an amp to drive them the 700s sound slightly anemic and generic. With an amp they seem to bloom like the desert after a rain storm, coming alive and adding a sense of urgency to the music. Even if you already own a pair of the 800s, you may still want to audition the 700s. Their "relaxed" upper range mitigates what a small **spam editat**ity of listeners have occasionally found tiring in the HD 800s: their relentlessly accurate and analytical acoustic approach. The HD 700s reproduce music with a natural, burnished warmth and non-aggressive clarity. Their substantially lower price than the 800s make them a bit more enticing when considering value. The Sennheiser HD 700s are a solid choice amongst many available options. They are not better headphones than the HD 800s, just different with an appealingly natural approach to music. The two models make an interesting complementary pair at the peak of Sennheiser's price range. The HD 700s will definitely appeal to audiophiles.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-HD-700-Headphone/dp/B0070U8KSM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1479329210&sr=8-1&keywords=sennheiser+hd+700

 

- placa de sunet Creative X7

"Here's as shortest way to describe what the X7 has to offer: it weaves the web of practically all your audio sources into an all-in-one high fidelity component and plays them back (almost) however you want. The X7 offers a surround DSP, desktop DAC, desktop headphone amp, passive speaker amp [!], and beam forming microphone. The X7 can connect to optical (game consoles!), USB, analog RCA line-in, mic line-in, and Bluetooth sources. Plus, it looks awesome with its pyramid/prism shape, uncluttered front, volume/mute knob at the apex, and wire headphone stand/home above it. Overall the X7 is a smaller unit than I expected and it rated an "Oh, that's a tidy little setup" from my girlfriend."

 

https://www.amazon.com/Creative-X7-High-Resolution-Headphone-Connectivity/dp/B00Q3XLGLU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1479329235&sr=8-2&keywords=creative+x7

 

Suna mai bine ca vechea combinatie (bate la fund orice fel de boxe , doar daca ai cateva mii de euro pe boxe high end).

[robert_]

ceva slabut fata de ce se prezinta pe aicea: Harman Kardon 7000 + infinity primus ps 8

[skyseven]

[skyseven]

Am la prajit un amplificator de casti cu dac built-in care presteaza foarte bine raportat la banii lui

Matrix M-Stage HPA-3U.

 

Daca vreti ii fac o mica recenzie

Sunetul este neutru, transparent, scula extrage bine detaliile, separatie buna, sound-stage generos si o textura sonora rafinata. Instrumentele si vocile au corp carnos si sunt suficient de credibile. Recomand!

[machucambo]

Vrabia mihai viteazu

[deep river reloaded]

Acasa: Marantz, boxe Klipsch... Nu-i nevoie de Smart TV. Peste cativa ani ma gandesc sa-mi amenajez o camera multimedia...

In masina: Bose

[thecat]

Acasa: Marantz, boxe Klipsch... Nu-i nevoie de Smart TV. Peste cativa ani ma gandesc sa-mi amenajez o camera multimedia...

In masina: Bose

 

De curiozitate: Klipsch + Marantz stereo, sau surround? Acum cativa ani am ascultat, la o editie Hi-Fi Arena, Klipsch stereo amplificate de... f*tu-i, nu mai retin   (Vincent, parca...?) - si mi-au placut, atata cat poa' sa-ti placa o auditie intr-o camera de hotel neamenajata / netratata etc.

 

In alta ordine de idei, ma surprinde placut sa aflu ca avem (inca) un interes comun...

[trollescoviciulos]

Bang olufsen

[deep river reloaded]

De curiozitate: Klipsch + Marantz stereo, sau surround? Acum cativa ani am ascultat, la o editie Hi-Fi Arena, Klipsch stereo amplificate de... f*tu-i, nu mai retin   (Vincent, parca...?) - si mi-au placut, atata cat poa' sa-ti placa o auditie intr-o camera de hotel neamenajata / netratata etc.

 

In alta ordine de idei, ma surprinde placut sa aflu ca avem (inca) un interes comun...

 

Boxele sunt asa: 2 boxe de raft RB-61, o boza centru RB-52, 2 boxe surround RS-42, subwoofer SW-112. Sistemul e de uz casnic si, deocamdata, sunt multumit de el. Sigur, se poate muuuult mai bine, dar, pana nu am o camera multimedia, e suficient.

 

P.S.: cred ca lista aceea cu interese comune e destul de lunga.

 

Bang olufsen

 

Ce model? Gang Bang Olufsen?

[picon]

Acasă mag Kashtan și stație Vermona, la mașină, radio Pescăruș prins cu izolir-band de bord.